Octopuses, we know, eat shrimp. So what was going on when a new species of shrimp was found living in the den of a common octopus (Octopus vulgaris)? In False Bay, South Africa, local divers, a filmmaker, and a scientist collaborated to find three new shrimp species, but the first was the most interesting. In addition to dwelling with the octopus and, for some reason, not being devoured, Also of note: the scientist involved, Charles Griffiths, is no newcomer to new species, He has, in fact, described over 100! Leave some for the rest of us, Charles...
C.S. Lewis: Don't use words too big for the subject. Don't say 'infinitely' when you mean 'very'; otherwise you'll have no word left when you want to talk about something really infinite.
Even in literature and art, no man who bothers about originality will ever be original: whereas if you simply try to tell the truth (without caring twopence how often it has been told before) you will, nine times out of ten, become original without ever having noticed it. Eric Burns: It's not enough to create magic. You have to create a price for magic, too. You have to create rules. Jesse Stuart: Write something to suit yourself and many people will like it; write something to suit everybody and scarcely anyone will care for it. John Irving: The way you define yourself as a writer is that you write every time you have a free minute. If you didn't behave that way you would never do anything.
The Trump administration requested $19.092B for NASA in FY18, essentially the same amount the agency has in FY17. The relevant House and Senate committees have approved significantly higher amounts. (About $19.5B in the Senate and over $19.8B in the House.) The issue has yet to go to a conference committee.
One of the bones of contention is science, which includes Earth science, which includes climate monitoring and climate change research. With this issue a political hot potato, The Predient and GOP Congressional leaders generally want a reduction in the science budget, but amounts vary enormously, as does controlling language about how the money can be spent.
The Administration is very much in favor of increased private participation and increased human spaceflight funding. The President at one point promised "American boots on Mars" during his second term. This probably is not doable even if the budget was unlimited, which it most certainly will not be. The Space Launch System and the Orion capsule which would be part of such a mission have not even flown.
The other touchy topic is NASA's Office of Education. The President requested only $37M for Education - just enough to shut down the office and most educational programs. While NASA education programs do include materials explaining and warning of climate change, the complete elimination of the office took NASA-watchers by surprise. Congress has put its collective foot down to block this move: the House wants $100M for education in the new year.
Some of this confusion exists because it's not clear who will run the agency or how oversight will work. The revised National Space Council (a good idea) has yet to meet, or to schedule a meeting: the Administration has not yet named its NASA Administrator. The President presented himself as a big fan of space exploration, especially human spaceflight, so it's quite puzzling the Administration has not even tried to fill the Administrator post.
On the positive side, the agency can rest assured it will not take an overall cut and will continue the Office of Education. On other matters, though, the space telescope image is rather murky. Here's hoping the officials involved get that straightened out and give the Agency a course to set.
Seriously. In the 21st century, an Australian postdoc and her associates found the biggest bony fish in the world, a new species (the fourth known) of the great ocean sunfish.
The sunfish is one of the strangest fish in the sea. Imagine a half-deflated circular blimp the size of a car. It looks like a fish the Almighty got halfway through designing and then lost interest and just stuck the tailfins on. It spends countless hours lying on its side, basking at the surface, slurping up jellyfish (and, unfortunately, plastic bags - thanks, humans) or diving to find them in deeper waters.. Its cartilage-underlayed-skin is so thick and hard it's difficult to harpoon one, so Pacific fishing cultures have generally left the animal alone. The third species, still referred to simply as Mola Species C, was only found in 2009, by the way.
DNA collections from sunfish stranded, caught, or tagged indicated there were most likely four species of the fish (the signature one being Mola mola), but only three had ever been described. Maryanne, Nyegaard confirmed this oddity while examining known DNA records for the PhD dissertation. Once she'd determined there was a missing sunfish, she set about roaming beaches and museums to confirm a specimen. She kept it up for three years. Fishermen sent her photos and DNA of an odd-looking sunfish they had caught, and then four such fish stranded in New Zealand, and Nyegaard was ready to write her name in scientific history along with the enigmatic Mola tecta. (She found other specimens in museum collections, where scientists had logged them in without noticing their oddities.) Sunfish are known for surpassing a metric ton in weight, but M. tecta is at the top of the scale, and appears to have the largest average size of any species. The longest specimen identified was 2.42 meters (just short of eight feet). It lacks a protruding snout and a bumpy region on the back that other sunfish species develop as adults.
So welcome to the biggest bony fish in the world, a monster harmless to humans but startling in size and appearance, and outweighed among fishes only by the largest of sharks. It's about time you showed up.
Yes, it's only July, but these folks always publish their Top 10 list for the year early (to beat the holiday rush, or something?) The ESF Top 10 list from the International Institute for Species Exploration has something for everyone. There's a spiny ant - and we mean really spiny - christened Pheiodole drogon - yes, for Drogon, the black dragon in Game of Thrones, because the creature's well-defended back looked like the dragon's to the scientist involved. We have a spider with a body shaped like the Hogwarts sorting hat - so here is Eriovixia gryffindori. There's a new katydid with an astonishing resemblance to a leaf. The Sulawesi root rat Gracilimus radix is unique among its kind for enjoying veggies in addition to meat. (Maybe this was the species that showed up in Ratatouille.) A California millipede adapted for an all-liquid diet (I don't want to know what liquids) made the list, which celebrates scientific importance of the species selected rather than size or mass appeal. Potamotrygon rex is a ray from Brazil sporting spectacular yellow or orange sport stretching well over a meter in length and weighing up to 20 kg. Southeast Asia contributes a big (20 cm), poisonous (of course) centipede (as Odgen Nash said, "a bug we do not really need") with amazing swimming and diving abilities: it can walk on the bottom, using stored oxygen. The bush tomato is a spiky little Australian fruit whose name was chosen with input from 150 7-th grade students in Pennsylvania. An orchid from Columbia sports reproductive parts looking like the head of the traditional devil. And Xenoturbella churro is a deep-dwelling marine worm that, to someone who is a very sloppy cook, looks sort of / kind of / approximately like a churro. Bigfoot,is seems, has escaped for another year, but the list is important as a reminder of how many species we have yet to find, and how badly we need to protect them. Several are already in danger.
By that I mean there is that ignoring climate change is unrealistic, but stating the extreme worst cases as fact damages the efforts at education and boosts the chance people will ignore the topic, either because the exaggerations cast aspersions on all the scientific claims or because people may say "oh well, we're doomed." A recent New Yorker article proclaiming we're all going to die sparked a series of scientific points and counterpoints, all nicely summarized in this blog post by Tabitha Powledge.
The fuss being made online and on the Un-History Channel is over one newly discovered photo. It shows a woman, her back to the camera, and a man who resembles her navigator Fred Noonan. While the man looks like Noonan, and short-haired women wearing pants were a bit unusual, we don't even know the date of the photo. This atoll in the Marshall Islands was unreachable with the fuel Earhart had, and the people in the photo are not under arrest or confinement.... Just not impressed. Too many questions are raised, and none have good answers.
UPDATE: It appears the photo is dated 1935, which confirms it's a mistake to link it to Earhart. .
The blue-winged Amazon parrot, found on the Yucatan peninsula in 2014, reportedly "sounds more like a hawk than a parrot." It was spotted by a veterinarian who noted both appearance and call were different than those of known parrots. The species was immediately listed as Critically Endangered by the IUCN: we don't know how many there are, but it's rare, and its habitat is under constant pressure. Poachers roam the area, too (although the exact spot of the discovery is being concealed.) But this discovery is still good news: the first step in conservation is to know that a species exists to be conserved.
One large whale (the unique sperm whale) has teeth, and all the smaller whales and dolphins do. The rest, the mysticetes, ranging from medium-size to titanic, use baleen to strain out fish or crustaceans. When did the split from the early toothed ancestors occur? Now we know. This whale, 28 million years old, has a sieve made out of teeth, a huge and heretofore undocumented change in the cetacean lifestyle. To my fellow Christians who think the world is young and the fossil record lacks transitional specimens, I would say you can't ask for a better transitional fossil than this one.
When Fish Got Feet, Sharks Got Teeth, and Bugs Began to Swarm: A Cartoon Prehistory of Life Long Before Dinosaurs Paperback– 2009
by Hannah Bonner Amazon data:
Age Range: 10 and up
Grade Level: 5 and up
Paperback: 48 pages
Publisher: National Geographic Children's Books; Reprint edition (September 8, 2009)
This book offers a unique and delightful look at the Silurian and Devonian periods, suitable for school children but including some funny bits and cool facts that will help adults learn or recall the main events of this pivotal time in our planet's history. It also is the only book I've seen for kids that provides some information on my favorite predator, Dunkleosteus, incidentally playing it conservative and assigning a length of 6m where some books say 8 and a few old ones say 10. There are short, clear explanations of everything from the creation of soil to the adaptations needed for plants and animals to invade the dry land environment. Recommended to my by no less than Matt Mossbrucker and Dr. Robert Bakker, this is just a terrific book: order one for your kid's library and another for yourself.
New mammal species in North America are very rare - years can go by without finding a new rodent (they pretty much all are rodents these days.) However, here's something a bit more spectacular - a new flying squirrel. Humboldt's flying squirrel is a bit smaller and darker than the close relative is used to be mistaken for.
Discovery never ends...
Everyone is fascinated by the idea of "living fossils," which
isn’t a precise scientific term but is a popular way to refer to animals which
have survived unchanged while the evolving world passed them by. I looked at a lot of these in Rumors of Existence, my first book, and they still interest me.
The coelacanth is the most famous: others
include the tuatara, a lizardlike New Zealand reptile whose three eyes (the
third is degenerate but functional) watched the dinosaurs come and go.
The term "living fossil" is not reserved for
vertebrates. Among the myriad specimens
dredged up by the famous Galathea expedition in the early 1950s were ten
limpet-like shelled animals. They came
from sea-bottom mud over 3,000, t beneath the surface off the Pacific coast of
Costa Rica. What were they? No one was
sure. The new discoveries had pale
yellow shells with an oval shape, about four cm long and one cm high. A
large foot (colored pink and blue) was surrounded by five pairs of primitive
While the shell
and teeth said "mollusc," the gill regions showed a segmented
construction resembling annelid worms.
Was the new animal either of these, or was it something entirely
unique? It most resembled a model that
biologist Brooks Knight had created showing what the ancestor of today's
molluscs might have looked like. But
that hypothetical animal - no actual fossil had ever been found - was presumed to have died out 350 million
years ago. Neopilina galathea filled an important gap in the
evolutionary record. Taxonomically, the
little critter was literally placed in a class by itself. Since then, more Neopilina species have been
dredged from the depths. The scientific
detective work of finding more examples and determining their exact place in
the parade of evolution goes on.
The great pioneering
undersea vessel, the submersible Alvin (still working today!) pulled in one of its many notable discoveries in 1979. Near a hydrothermal vent in the eastern
Pacific, researchers on the sub collected a strange-looking stalked barnacle,
the stalk serving to allow these normally fixed creatures some degree of
mobility. It had never been seen before,
even as a fossil, but apparently belonged to a group which flourished before
the dawn of the Age of Reptiles.
The waters off New
Zealand produced a similar surprise in 1985.
Clinging to sunken logs a thousand meters below the surface was a round
animal barely over a centimeter wide.
Named the sea daisy, it appeared to be a distant relative of the
starfish, even though only vestiges of the classic five-pointed starfish design
were apparent. That was enough to put it
into same phylum, the echinoderms, but it proved very difficult to classify
this diminutive invertebrate more precisely. The sea daisy is spiny on top, and
its underside is covered by a flat membrane that biologist Michael Bright
compares to plastic wrap stretched over an upside-down saucer. The sea daisy, too, was assigned its own
class (now the infraclass Concenticloidea, in which it inhabits the order Peripodida. Two other speies have been added). When it was discovered there was just nothing like it,
except for fossils predating the dinosaurs.
Fossils from the
same period included the graptolites, tiny colonial creatures who built homes
of collagen secretions layered in strips like mummy bandages. At one end of each 2.5cm-long long communal
house, a peculiar sharp spike rose like a TV antenna. Graptolites were presumed to be related to
modern homebuilders called pterobranches, but pterobranch dwellings lacked the
After an apparent
absence of 300 million years, graptolites resurfaced. In 1992, French researchers sent a sampling
of seafloor specimens to Dr. Noel Dilly, a London ophthalmologist whose
"hobby" of studying pterobranches grew on him until he became one of
the leading experts on the animals.
Dilly's first reaction was, "Not another boring collection to hack
through." His second was, "I
don't believe this." He was looking
at characteristic graptolite dwellings, spikes and all.
The graptolite is
a reminder that not all animals evolve: some just find a comfortable ecological
niche and settle down for a long stay.
There an awful lot
of little creatures like this to be found.
In the mid-1980s, Frederick Grassle of Rutgers University led an effort
to collect over two hundred core samples of the Atlantic seafloor. When all the sediment had been sifted, the
somewhat flabbergasted scientists found they had collected 460 new
The littlest animals offer many surprises, and
no one thinks the surprises are over.
SOME FUN READING
Batten, Roger L. 1984. "Neopilina, Neomphalus and Neritopsis:
Living Fossil Molluscs," in Eldredge, Niles, and Steven M. Stanley (eds).
Living Fossils. New York: Springer
Bright, Michael. 1987. The Living World. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Cromie, William J. 1966. The Living World of the Sea. Englewood
Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Huyghe, Patrick. 1993. "New Species Fever," Audubon,
Kaharl, Victoria A. 1990. Water
Baby: the Story of Alvin. New York:
Oxford University Press.
Soule, Gardner (ed.) 1968. Under
the Sea. New York: Meredith Press.
Svitil, Kathy. 1993. "It's Alive, and It's a
Graptolite," Discover, July.
Taylor, Mike. 1993. "Home and Away," BBC Wildlife,
Wilson, Edward O. 1992. The
Diversity of Life. Cambridge, MA:
The President, as Presidents can do, withdrew from an executive agreement signed by his predecessor. OK, that's legal. It does not make it wise. In the Industrial Age, we have poured 600 billion tons of carbon products and compounds into the atmosphere. Now, the atmosphere weighs about 5.5 quadrillion tons, so it's not like we've replaced the whole shebang, but chemical reactions are tricky things. Just as you cannot ignore 25 µg of LSD in your 80kg body (it will probably kill you), you can't ignore 400 ppm of carbon compounds. We haven't had that much in hundreds of years, and climate scientists are almost universal in their agreement this is enough to be really, really scary. It's not that 400 is a magic number that tips us into a pit of no return. But as one JPL expert. Dr. Michael Gunson, puts it, "Passing the 400 mark reminds me that we are on an inexorable march to 450 ppm and much higher levels. These were the targets for 'stabilization' suggested not too long ago. The world is quickening the rate of accumulation of CO2, and has shown no signs of slowing this down. It should be a psychological tripwire for everyone." As another NASA expert, Dr. David Crisp, says, (400ppm) "brings home the fact that fossil fuel combustion, land use practices, and human activities have increased the CO2 concentration in Earth’s atmosphere by more the 20 percent since I was born." It's not a conspiracy. There has never, in human history, been a situation where 95 percent (or so) of scientists in a given field were all in on a conspiracy. A large majority of scientists can be wrong (see: continental drift), and the self-correction mechanisms of science work a lot slower and clunkier than we would like, but we're talking about decades of near-consensus despite bringing online more andmoreaccurate tools and measurements without budging the needle one bit on the "consensus-o-meter." We're talking about research that's gone on long enough that a new generation of climate scientists has come in since the early alarms were sounded, eager to find new things, and what they found was the same thing - only worse. We have to act. Yes, some of the hand-waving about the magic of renewables is wishful thinking: we cannot change the global economy easily or painlessly. Any time you see a headline like "Germany Ran On 100 percent Renewables Today" it's always a result of cherry-picked data. The task ahead of us is orders of magnitude harder than putting up more windmills. But we still have to address it. One GOP Congressman said God will fix it. Le'ts talk about God for a minute. I believe in God, although I don't read the Old Testament literally. God did do something: he gave us the brains to solve our problems if we muster the will. Let's take Exodus. Whether you think the flight through the Red Sea is literally true or is a story written to emphasize God's love for His people, the lesson is that same. If Moses was going to get everyone across that sea before it closed in on the Egyptians, he had the sense to hurry, to leave behind possessions, to help the old and slow keep up, and otherwise to get organized really fast under pressure and execute the plan he needed to execute. If God wields the power He displays in parting the sea, it must also be true that He could have reached down, made the escape route permanent, and crushed the Egyptian army so Moses could take his time. But God doesn't do that: He creates just enough of an opportunity that Moses and company could take advantage of it if they did all they could for themselves. They did, and we can do no less. A common Christian precept is "God has no hands but ours." We are entrusted with the stewardship over the planet and our fellow creatures, and no one is going to save them if we don't. The President is not entirely wrong when he says the U.S. is called on to do more sacrificing than most nations. We are. But that's because we have the means. Just as the U.S. needed to take a leading role against the Axis in WWII, because we had the industrial might to do more than the outnumbered British or the conquered French, we have to take a leading role against this enemy. In some ways, it's not fair. But the facts on the ground don't change. Those who can do the most have to do the most. The President doesn't like the idea of the U.S. surrendering some sovereignty, but we are really not: as the accords are not binding, we can choose how much to contribute or how much to change. The other nations can't force us to, say, contribute $200 billion over the next whatever vs. $100 bliion (or $300 billion). We can and msut take a leadership role, but we decide the details of that role. Let's forge on.
To image distant stars and planets with increasingly greater precision, you need a baseline array of two or more satellites looking from slightly different angles (a massive oversimplification, but stay with me here, I admit to not being a space engineer). The point is that it's very difficult to get satellites into the right formation and hold it without impractical quantities of fuel. A US/South Korean project is testing it with two CubeSats, one 2u (two unit, 20cm x 10cm x 10 cm), and a 1U (10x10x10 cm) for less than $1M. Aviation Weeks's overview (may require free registration) is here, and the launch provider (India) posts its manifest here. NASA's article is here. It's amazing stuff for a tiny spacecraft costing less than a lot of U.S. houses!
Fast in evolutionary terms, anyway. Today's filter-feeding giants appear only 2-3 million years ago in the fossil record. Why? According to these scientists, it was pretty simple: unlimited food. With predators, mainly orcas, getting 8-9 m long and hunting in packs, size provided protection, but getting big is a defense that can only work if there is no shortage of food. As the lush plants of the Mesozoic let plant-eating dinosaurs grow to 30m and more in length, having a "license to krill" (I love that pun, although I did not invent it), let blue whales push the 100 metric ton mark.
This outing for "enigmaologist" Logan offers a lot of fun for his growing number of fans. While it has slow spots and not every twist is a surprise, readers will learn more about Logan in the course of his effort to relax and write a monograph on history at a retreat that is a little too close to some strange, savage murders. Investigating at the behest of a new and interesting character, a philosopher-forest ranger he knew at college, Logan finds a hidden laboratory run by a mad scientist (as in, not so much crazy as literally MAD at everyone) and a local belief in lycanthropy. This sounds cliched, but the Logan novels are out to put a new spin on classic horror tales, and Child keeps it fresh. The atmosphere is wonderfully real and creepy. There is some interesting real science, some way-out invented science, a little bit of the paranormal, and some nods to the old Hammer Films universe as Logan risks his life to figure out who or what is haunting the remote Appalachian forest. As a science writer and a novelist, I appreciate the way Child can meld the real (gene therapy), the speculative (what if full moon effects are not mythical after all, we've just not studied them right?), and the horrific.
Fossil news seems to come in too fast to keep track of these days, but this chance discovery pretty much froze paleontologists in their trackways. One of the best fossils ever
A Canadian fossil of a nodosaur (think the iconic Ankylosaurus with no club tail but some big shoulder spikes) was buried in a shallow sea in fine sediments under conditions that offered extraordinary preservation. Scientists can see where the horn spike ended and the keratin sheath began and extended from it. They can count the scales on its body. "It looks like a sculpture" seems to be a common comment. Five years of painstaking work, totaling some 7,000 man-hours (not unheard-of in paleontology!) were needed to free up, clean, and reassemble the front half of the animal. That's all we have, but scientists are happy to take it. The skin is there. Even traces of its coloration remain. It's a marvel.
Hunting Monsters: Cryptozoology and the Reality Behind the Myths
by Darren Naish
(paperback edition, 2017, Sirius)
As a cryptozoological reader of some 40 years and writer of
20+, and a correspondent of Dr. Naish, I looked forward to this book, and I'm
hardly disappointed. Naish offers a very good skeptical analysis of the whole
cryptozoology business, even if I think it could have been a little better.
point a reader will notice early on is that there is so much ground to cover
that the author can only touch on many points in passing. Skipping over the
Great New England Sea Serpent, a touchstone of the sea monster topic, is an
Naish starts with whether cryptozoology is, or can be, scientific, and
agrees it can be but isn't often. He begins and ends with the point
cryptozoology exists in a cultural milieu and is influenced by folklore,
tradition, etc. as well as modern innovations like the Internet. This isn't
entirely original and he credits influences including Dr. Charles Paxton, whose work I greatly
admire, and folklorist Michel Meurger, who I've always thought overreached the
Naish is not closed-minded about this. He has himself put
forward new species concepts over the years to explain cryptozoological
sightings, including a cryptid seal and a giant orangutan, but in his blog
Tetrapod Zoology and elsewhere he's uncovered or been offered new information
and has generally come to conclude the "star" animals are not
physically there. This book explains his reasoning well.
When he offers an explanation, I'm not always entirely
convinced: the "finning" seal (a seal waving one flipper in the air
for cooling) for the Valhalla sighting, for example, is clever, but I can't
look at the first-hand original drawing and get a seal out of it. (As you can
tell, I enjoy sea serpent lore more than the rest of the subject these days.)
The opposite is true of the HMS Daedalus sighting, which I think we can put to
The subject is vast and Naish can't help that, so the
bibliography is essential: it's pretty good but could have been more extensive.
Lest anyone think I'm damning with faint praise, this is an
excellent and important book. If it doesn't hunt down every major cryptid, it
will make the veteran cryptozoology reader think hard and will give the new
reader an excellent starting point grounded in good science.
The white sturgeon of the Fraser River is an impressive creature, known to reach over 3 meters and approach 400kg,and claimed to reach 6 meters. It comes in definite or reported shades of green, brown, or black (never white - go figure). But a gold sturgeon? It exists, and this video proves it. Fortunately, the two fishermen who caught it did the right thing and released it to continue to grow and, perhaps, enchant people in the future. Sometimes it's ok to just look at nature and say, "wow."
"Normal" white sturgeon (Wikimedia Commons - photo by Joseph Tomerelli)
Don't forget the role of the giant sturgeon in myth and legend, captured by Longfellow in this case of an improbably big and improbably colorful sturgeon (purple fins?)
Forth upon the Gitche Gumee, On the shining Big-Sea-Water, With his fishing-line of cedar, Of the twisted bark of cedar, Forth to catch the sturgeon Nahma, Mishe-Nahma, King of Fishes, In his birch canoe exulting All alone went Hiawatha. Through the clear, transparent water He could see the fishes swimming Far down in the depths below him; On the white sand of the bottom Lay the monster Mishe-Nahma, Lay the sturgeon, King of Fishes; Through his gills he breathed the water, With his fins he fanned and winnowed, With his tail he swept the sand-floor. There he lay in all his armor; On each side a shield to guard him, Plates of bone upon his forehead, Down his sides and back and shoulders Plates of bone with spines projecting! Painted was he with his war-paints, Stripes of yellow, red, and azure, Spots of brown and spots of sable; And he lay there on the bottom, Fanning with his fins of purple, As above him Hiawatha In his birch canoe came sailing, With his fishing-line of cedar. "Take my bait," cried Hiawatha, Down into the depths beneath him, "Take my bait, O Sturgeon, Nahma! Come up from below the water, Let us see which is the stronger!"
From the white sand of the bottom Up he rose with angry gesture, Quivering in each nerve and fibre, Clashing all his plates of armor, Gleaming bright with all his war-paint; In his wrath he darted upward, Flashing leaped into the sunshine, Opened his great jaws, and swallowed Both canoe and Hiawatha.
In the modern (post-WWII) history of “sea serpent” reports and claims - and there are still reports, albeit rarely - we have only one claim of human fatalities. This story appeared in the May 1965 issue of Fate Magazine and still kicks around in the Internet.
In a first-person account, Edward Brian McCleary claimed to have had a terrifying experience on March 24, 1962 off Pensacola, Florida. McCleary and four friends paddled a life raft out to dive on a wrecked ship. A sudden storm came up, forcing them away from land. At night, a fog closed in on them. In the fog, they hear something moving, and then saw what looked momentarily like a “like a telephone pole about ten feet high with a bulb on top” in the fog. The object was, however, a plesiosaur-like animal. More specifically, “The neck was about 12 feet long, brownish-green and smooth looking. The head was like that of a sea-turtle, except more elongated with teeth. There appeared to be what looked like a dorsal fin when it dove under for the last time. Also, as best I am able to recall, the eyes were green with oval pupils.”
This creature proceeded to kill McCleary’s companions one by one. McCleary alone managed to make it to a protruding mast of the wreck they were diving (the U.S.S. Massachusetts), where he clung until daylight.
The Massachusetts sits today in only 26 feet of water in the Fort Pickens State Aquatic Preserve, with portions of the ship still protruding from the sea. McCleary still lives in Florida, though he apparently has not spoken on the subject of the attack since his article came out. The deaths are real, too, and McCleary did report them, but the Coast Guard found nothing more than a tragic episode of accidental drowning.
What are we to make of this? It's very hard to take seriously even if, as some researchers (myself included) believe, there might still be a huge eel or other creature behind some sea serpent stories, The plesiosaur-like creature striking its victims from the fog sounds like a scene from a bad horror movie. The very plesiosaur-like sketch McCleary made of his creature shows the head joined to the neck at an odd 90-degree angle, and McCleary does not explain by what light he saw enough to describe his creature. So I'm afraid we have to write this tale off. The sea serpent is the most romantic (in the Victorian sense) of legendary creatures, and no one wants to let go of it, but no one can catch hold of it, either. Fortunately, the animals the DO inhabit the oceans are spectacular and curious enough for anyone..
Helm, Thomas. Monsters of the Deep. New York: Dodd, Mead, & Co. 1962. Heuvelmans, Bernard. In the Wake of the Sea-Serpents. New York: Hill & Wang, 1968. McCleary, Edward Brian. “My Escape From a Sea Monster,” FATE, May 1965. Online sources including trueauthority.com, unexplained-mysteries.com, answers.yahoo.com, and (for the Ray Angerman story)
I've never been quite convinced the ivory-billed woodpecker (Campephilus principalis) is extinct. It may be wishful thinking, or it may be that a story I heard 20 years ago lingers in my mind. I was in the Denver Museum of Nature and Science talking to a woman sculpting an elk. The story she told me is that years after the last supposed confirmation of the ivory-bill (1950, Florida) she'd been a girl of about 10 hiking in the Singer Tract in Louisiana. Her father put a finger to his lips to shush her and pointed to a magnificent red, white, and black bird on a stump in front of them. The witness, Ruth Laws (or Lowes: I didn't write down the spelling and haven't been able to locate her) said her father whispered, "That is an ivory-billed woodpecker. Take a good look, because you'll never see one again." She never did. This bird may be extinct. It may very well be functionally extinct - that is, there are some individuals, but not enough to continue the species. People like Michael Collins of the Naval Research Laboratory spend years of their lives searching for the birds. Collins thinks he's found them. His videos, according to other experts, are not definitive: the birds in them could be ivory-bills, but they are too far from the camera to tell, so they might also be pileated woodpeckers, although the behavior certainly fits. There are good reasons we all want the bird to be found. The nickname "Lord God bird" was applied based on the exclamations of countless witnesses. One
admiring expert, ornithologist
Dr. Lester Short, wrote that, "If the woodpecker world
had royalty, the ivory⌐bill would be king." The bird had a specialized diet, based on beetles living in dying or recently dead trees in Southern forests. When these forests were cleared, the birds had a difficult - maybe impossible - task in adapting to secondary growth. Still, reports lingered - in Florida, in Arkansas, and in other states. Ornithologist John V. Dennis had a good sighting in East Texas in 1966. Dr. Jerome Jackson got responses to recordings of ivory-bills in 1987 and 1988. In Cuba, a bird was conclusively identified in 1986, although an extensive search in 1993 found nothing, and that seems to have been the last of the Cuban birds (sometimes considered a separate subspecies). (Or was it? Ornithologist Tim Gallagher led an expedition to the island in 2016, although proof remained elusive.) In April 1999, David Kulivan, a graduate student in wildlife biology, spotted a pair in Louisiana's Pearl River Wildlife Management Area. The sighting was convincing enough to result in a major search, without luck. The LouisianaOrnithological Society put out an ivory-bill T-shirt captioned, "I Want To Believe," a mantra from the The X-Files.In 2004, a sighting and video from Arkansas led to the official announcement of the bird's rediscovery by U.S. government authorities. (The result, published in the leading journal Science, might be the most famous paper ever published about birds.) The identity of the bird in the video has since been questioned, though and the species, once again, seems to have disappeared. And so it goes - scattered reports, calls, distant images and videos. The ivory-bill has become the sasquatch of the bird world - widely sought, wiedely believed in, but not quite there in evidence the scientific world can widely accept. I think it's still there. Because I want to.
Hoose, Philip. 2004. The Race to Save the Lord God Bird. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Jackson, Jerome. 2004. In Search of the Ivory-Billed Woodpecker. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian.
Jackson, Jerome. 2002. “The
Truth is Out There,” Birder’s World,
Lammertink, Martjan, Kenneth V. Rosenberg, John W. Fitzpatrick, M.
David Luneau, Jr., Tim W. Gallagher, Marc Dantzker. “Detailed analysis of the
video of a large woodpecker (the "Luneau video") obtained at Cache
River National Wildlife Refuge, Arkansas, on 25 April 2004,” February 8, 2006,
Louisiana Ornithological Society.
Woodpecker Sightings at Pearl River WMA?" LOS News, February.
Martel, Brent. 2000. "Birder Says He Saw Rare
Woodpecker," Associated Press,
Mayell, Jillary. 2002. “’Extinct Woodpecker Still Elusive,” National Geographic News,
http://news.nationalgeographic.com, February 20.
Short, Lester. 1993. The Lives of Birds. New York: Henry Holt
Short, Lester, and Jennifer Horne.
1986. "The Ivorybill Still
Lives," Natural History, July.
Sources including SCIENCE magazine have parsed the funding in the new continuing resolution covering FY17, and it's not terrible - in most ways.
The big cuts feared by science advocates are not in this bill. NASA does more than ok with $19.653 billion for the whole fiscal year. Indeed, NASA does a lot better overall than was projected by the last Obama budget, with the biggest increase coming in the Exploration account, which includes human exploration, a favorite of the new President. Planetary science went up, and Earth science, a likely future target, gets the same amount as in FY16.
Basic and applied research goes up, and both military and civilian agencies benefit. The EPA's research budget took a major hit, though, and the Department of Energy's fusion-power research was hammered, which has international implications given the consortium on the ITER experiment would have to push out their deadlines (at best) without U.S funding. (Also, my personal opinion is that anything that moves us closer to fusion power needs a MAJOR increase, not a cut.) The Congress controlled by the President's party poked him in the eye, sharply, with a $2 billion increase for NIH.
President Trump's FY18 budget is another matter: it's the one that slashes much more funding for the EPA and biomedical research, among other things.
A great 2017 conference! A few takeaways from the Pikes Peak Writers Conference, shared for fellow authors: Agent Sam Morgan agreed with a quote from Dean Koontz I mentioned (that you can have one big improbability in your story if you nail down all other details in reality) and added that, for any kind of thriller,"You get one coincidence. Just one." Agent Donald Maass emphasized that in any interaction between people, there are always multiple levels of emotions at work, never just one emotion. Maass also took issue with the pessimistic view of the long odds against getting published because you can change the odds. How many books you write,how many agents you query, how hard to work at your craft, etc. - it's not like a casino where a thousand to one guarantees you lose. Author Jennie Marts emphasized the need to use every tool available on your Amazon author page and your individual book pages to make you look good, to tell your story, and to promote your other books. Also Jennie Marts: You begin to define your "brand" with the first work you publish in any form. Keep the big picture of what kind of author you want to be in mind with everything you do. The "brand" you project is a promise to your readers about what they will get if they buy your books. From multiple sources: While you should try to make your query letter and proposal perfect, one error won't kill you. One agent scratched out two whole paragraphs of my one-page query letter but asked to see sample chapters. Multiple sources: In adult fiction, a white guy like myself can write characters from many cultures if you avoid stereotyping, but most publishers are not open to someone like me writing middle grade or Young Adult fiction including foreign or minority cultures. (Comment: I understand the concern, but it seems to me that that may be TOO sensitive: researching a book is one of the best ways to learn about another culture and introduce it to readers. See: Dana Stabenow.) From author Laura DiSilverio: we under-use setting in defining characters. People decorate, not only houses, but cars, cubicles, etc. with things that can help readers understand them. Another good way to expose character is taking people out of their chosen or normal environment: how do they react? Consensus of agents and editors: avoid prologues unless they are really good and can't just be part of Chapter One: it's usually best to avoid them even then. (Comment: William Kent Krueger is a brilliant user of prologues.)
Myself, at the costume-optional Friday night dinner, as wizard Harry Dresden, with agent Donald Maas (agent for Harry's creator, Jim Butcher, to whom he sent this pic).
Author Travis Heerman: Stephen King (not present :) ) says all first drafts can be cut 10 percent. Also, revision should genuinely be "re-visioning," not just line editing. Use beta readers, reading aloud, text-to-speech, or any other tool to ensure you look at it it in different ways. This takes time and you MUST be willing to commit to it for a good book. Editor panel: Publishers grind everything through a profit-and-loss equation at some stage, but you can't control that: control what you can (writing a good book). Also, for fiction, a good enough book can make the cut even if the author doesn't have a major social media presence and followers: for nonfiction, it's much more important. Thanks again for a great conference. #PPWC2017 See you all at 2018 Conference. One guest already confirmed: favorite author (okay, co-favorite with Dana Stabenow) Jim Butcher.